![]() You can do white balance, exposure, and levels (per channel if you want) in the current version, and the upcoming High Sierra release adds a more traditional curves editor. I think this would never be the obvious thing to do.Īpple's Photos app does support some of these adjustments. If you work with curves, color channels, local adjustments etc. They are ready to give up as they are having a hard time dealing with the switch. Does this keep the basic keywords/albums etc from Aperture? Are Photos editing tools similar to what they were used to in Aperture like simple cropping etc? I wasn't much help with LR as I don't use it myself.Ī better route I could do for them might be to import there old Aperture archive into Photos which will be more familiar to them. I would say start with Photos and see if it meets you needs.ajack this is interesting as a Senior I have tried to help who first moved from Aperture to LR was having a hard time working in LR. ![]() There are a bunch of improvements coming this fall in the next version of Mac OS ("High Sierra"), including more editing tools and better support for external editors if you want to tweak a photo more. The Photos app is not that great but it does do raw support, non-destructive editing, basic cataloging like Albums and Keywords, etc. Depending on how much work you've done curating your photos, switching to another program could mean a HUGE loss of work. No need to redo all your edits, recategorize, etc. No it's not as good as Aperture was, but it's free and will import your library without any fuss. For anyone using Aperture the obvious thing to try first is Apple's Photos app.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |